MINUTES OF THE STATUTORY
PLANNING COMMITTEE OF THE PORT PHILLIP CITY
COUNCIL HELD ON 9 SEPTEMBER
2002, IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, ST KILDA TOWN HALL
The meeting opened at 6.05pm.
Cr Hill (Chairperson), Cr Brand, Cr
Johnstone, Cr Logan, Cr Ray (from 7.05pm), David Spokes Chief Executive
Officer, Geoff Oulton Director City Development, Bruce Phillips Manager
Planning and Building Services, Sue Wilkinson Team Leader Statutory Planning,
Simon Gutteridge Senior Planner.
The Chairperson (Cr Hill) acknowledged
the traditional owners of the land on which the Council meets, the Boonerwrung
language people and the Wurundjeri people as custodians.
Cr Hill tabled a paper in relation to the
General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) as follows:
The current negotiations on the General
Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) being conducted by the Australian
Government and other governments in the World Trade Organization (WTO) could
have serious repercussions for Australian local government.
GATS rules are binding on all levels of
government but there has been little if any consultation with local government
about the negotiations and their implications.
A recent study by the Canadian
Environmental Law Association (found at www.policyalternatives.ca)
identified areas of local government services and regulations which could be
affected by the GATS negotiations. The services identified included: Water and
sewerage services; Waste Management; Road Building; Land use planning; Library
services.
Changes to GATS rules on regulation of
services could mean that local councils could face complaints about their
regulations through the WTO complaints system. Governments can complain about
the laws or regulations of other governments to a panel of trade law experts.
The winner can ask that laws or regulations be changed and can ban or tax
exports of the loser.
The GATS agreement signed by Australia
and other governments in 1994 promotes international trade in services and
seeks to remove barriers to such trade. Although some GATS rules apply to all
services, many only apply to those services each government agrees to list in
the agreement. GATS has some rules
which recognize the right of governments to regulate services and to provide
and fund public services. However, there are now proposals to change these
rules.
Governments are being asked to increase
the range of services included in the GATS agreements. Requests in the
negotiations from the European Union, for example, include water services,
which in rural areas are often local government services. There are also
proposals in the negotiations to change GATS rules to reduce the right of governments
to regulate by declaring the some regulations of services should be “least
trade restrictive.” There are also proposals to define funding of government services
in GATS rules as “subsidies” to which transnational corporations should have
access, resulting in privatization.
1.
“That Council:
a) Believes public policy regarding the regulation, funding and provision of essential services should be made democratically by governments at the national, state and local level;
b) Calls on the Federal Government to fully consult with state and local government about the implications of the GATS negotiations for local government services and regulation;
c) Calls on the Federal Government to make public the specific requests it made to other governments in the GATS negotiations which were due on 30 June 2002;
d) Calls on the Federal Government to make public its specific responses to requests from other governments which are due on 30 March 2003;
e) Calls on the Federal Government to support the clear exclusion of public services from the GATS, including local government community services and water services;
f) Calls on the Federal Government to oppose any proposals which would open up the funding of such public services to privatization;
g) Calls on the Federal Government to oppose any proposals which would reduce the right of local government to regulate services, including the application of a “least trade restrictive” test to regulation;
h) Writes to the Minister for Trade concerning the above; and
i) Submits the above motions for adoption
by the Victorian Local Government Association at its next meeting with an
additional motion that they be submitted for adoption by the Australian Local
Government Association at its 2002 Annual Conference.”
MOVED Crs Hill/Ray
That the Paper be received and noted.
A vote was taken and the MOTION was CARRIED.
“Can the Chief Executive Officer and Mayor consider the information and draft motion (above) and take action as appropriate at the Ordinary Council Meeting to be held on 23 September 2002.”
Cr Hill also advised that the Australian Fair Trade of Investment Network is based in Sydney and they have a strong view to trade matters that are promoting this action.